Sen. Mark WarnerMark Robert WarnerHillicon Valley: Regulators press Congress on privacy bill | Americans mimic Russian disinformation tactics ahead of 2020 | Ocasio-Cortez, Sanders back Uber strike | GOP senator targets ‘manipulative’ video games Senate panel subpoenas Donald Trump Jr. Klobuchar pressures Barr, Mueller for more information on special counsel’s findings MORE (D-Va.) argued Thursday that while special counsel Robert MuellerRobert (Bob) Swan MuellerSasse: US should applaud choice of Mueller to lead Russia probe MORE did not establish that the Trump campaign conspired with Russia during the 2016 election, extensive foreign contacts in future elections should be considered conspiracy.
Warner, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, weighed in on the findings from Mueller’s special counsel probe during a Brookings Institution event while touting his Senate panel’s own probe into Russia’s election interference, calling it “the last remaining bipartisan investigation there is.”
ADVERTISEMENT
“I will accept Bob Mueller’s version that even though there were 100 contacts between Russians and the Trump Organization or the Trump campaign, even though the Trump campaign manager gave classified or secret polling data to a known Russian agent, even though Roger StoneRoger Jason StoneWhite House orders McGahn to defy House subpoena Stone associate to ask Supreme Court to take up challenge to Mueller’s appointment GOP optimism for 2020 was premature MORE acted as a conduit for WikiLeaks to dump hacked emails … even if all of that didn’t rise to the level of conspiracy charge, on a going-forward basis, it should,” Warner said.
Going forward, Warner argued that campaigns should have an “affirmative obligation” to report to the FBI any contacts with foreign officials or entities like those detailed in Mueller’s report. He also called on Congress to pass election security legislation such as the Secure Elections Act, which didn’t see action last Congress.
“The fact that we haven’t said to states that if you want federal money, you have got to have a paper trail … that is crazy that we don’t put rules in place,” Warner said.
Warner said that were it to be reintroduced, the Secure Elections Act “would get 85 votes on the floor of the U.S. Senate today if we didn’t have the White House and Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellOvernight Health Care: HHS issues rule requiring drug prices in TV ads | Grassley, Wyden working on plan to cap drug costs in Medicare | Warren to donate money from family behind opioid giant Republicans rip GOP Intel decision to subpoena Trump Jr. On The Money: White House files notice of China tariff hikes | Dems cite NYT report in push for Trump tax returns | Trump hits Iran with new sanctions | Trump praises GM for selling shuttered Ohio factory | Ex-Im Bank back at full strength MORE trying to impede it from even getting to the floor.”
The bill, which had bipartisan support from co-sponsors including Sens. Amy KlobucharAmy Jean Klobuchar2020 Democrats show off labor cred at union event Hillicon Valley: Regulators press Congress on privacy bill | Americans mimic Russian disinformation tactics ahead of 2020 | Ocasio-Cortez, Sanders back Uber strike | GOP senator targets ‘manipulative’ video games Klobuchar pressures Barr, Mueller for more information on special counsel’s findings MORE (D-Minn.) and James LankfordJames Paul LankfordExport-Import Bank back to full strength after Senate confirmations Schumer: McConnell trying to ‘whitewash’ Mueller report findings Senators introduce bill to prevent border agency from selling personal data MORE (R-Okla.) in the last Congress, would have given states more resources to protect their voting systems, among other provisions.
Warner cited not having election security legislation as encouraging foreign countries such as Russia and China to interfere in U.S. elections, as this “shows we’re not doing enough to even protect our own values and protect our own systems.”
During his Brookings appearance Thursday, Warner also sounded the alarm around cyber espionage threats from China and called for a new trade-deal effort that included language aimed at cutting down on these types of threats.
Warner criticized President TrumpDonald John TrumpMcMaster accuses some in White House of being a ‘danger to the Constitution’ Trump predicts Dem investigation will drive him to 2020 win Trump hits O’Rourke: ‘Boy has he fallen like a rock’ MORE for his “insatiable effort to declare victory even when there might not be a victory in hand,” predicting it could lead to a trade deal with China that may not address questions around intellectual property.
“In a world that moves increasingly at internet speed, we can’t wait until we have all the answers to wake up to this challenge,” Warner said of the threats posed by China. “We have to figure out how to protect ourselves, how to compete, and how to make sure that we are able to take advantage in a global landscape with China increasingly important to us, because the one thing we do know is that China has a plan.”