Progressives breathe sigh of relief after Afghan withdrawal

Progressives breathe sigh of relief after Afghan withdrawal

Progressives are breathing a sigh of relief over the end of U.S. military involvement in Afghanistan, praising President BidenJoe BidenTapper presses top Biden aide on Afghanistan: ‘How are you going to get those Americans out?’ Overnight Defense & National Security: War ends, but finger pointing continues On The Money — Companies consider making unvaccinated workers pay MORE‘s commitment to halting the forever war even as the chaotic withdrawal from Kabul comes under heavy criticism.

After the White House declared the war over on Monday and Biden defended his decisions Tuesday, liberal lawmakers, strategists and movement-aligned activists offered words of support for what they considered to be a tough but moral decision.

The “messaging from progressive thought leaders and organizations has been consistently critical of the ‘War on Terror’ and the war in Afghanistan more specifically,” said Adam Weinstein, a research fellow at Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft who helped organize a coalition of groups around anti-war efforts.


With regard to America’s involvement in longstanding battles, Weinstein sees two only options.

“You can either continue them to try to avoid the aftermath, and in doing so you incrementally make things worse and worse, or you can end them and you will have to deal with the aftermath, but you break the cycle,” he said. “What President Biden did was he made the decision to break the cycle.”

“I think we all expected the can to be kicked down the road. If you look at history, that was the bet to make,” Weinstein added. “The reason for that is precisely what we’re seeing right now: There was going to be a political backlash.”

While anti-Afghan invasion sentiment was scarce in Washington in 2001 when then-President George W. Bush unseated the Taliban, progressives became more fervent throughout the Bush years and subsequent administrations in their calls for a withdrawal, urging both former Presidents Obama and Trump to put a stop to what many perceived to be a misguided mission by the United States that had run its course.

On Tuesday, in an impassioned defense of his decision, Biden made clear he was sympathetic to that view.

“Leaving August the 31st is not due to an arbitrary deadline. It was designed to save American lives,” the president said from the State Dining Room late in the afternoon. “I was not going to extend this forever war. And I was not extending a forever exit.”


The speech was intended to give Americans a sober look at Biden’s international agenda, one that puts a premium on stopping oversees combat even when politically inconvenient.

“Afghanistan is known as the graveyard of empires for a reason,” said Cullen Tiernan, a Marine Corps veteran and former campaign aide to former Rep. Tulsi GabbardTulsi GabbardHillicon Valley: US has made progress on cyber but more needed, report says | Democrat urges changes for ‘problematic’ crypto language in infrastructure bill | Facebook may be forced to unwind Giphy acquisition YouTube rival Rumble strikes deals with Tulsi Gabbard, Glenn Greenwald Tulsi Gabbard on Chicago mayor’s decision to limit media interviews to people of color: ‘Anti-white racism’ MORE (D-Hawaii), who ran on a presidential platform of ending foreign wars.

“We have been there for 20 years, investing our lives, treasure and future into a corrupt Afghan government that clearly did not have the confidence or support of the Afghan people.”

After operations erupted into a disorderly scene in Kabul over the past two weeks, many expressed renewed frustration that the United States was involved in Afghanistan to begin with. That sentiment was bolstered by images and news reports of evacuation delays and the tragic killing of 13 American troops by ISIS militants.

Among progressives, many view the entire war as a wasteful act.

“Ending wars is good actually,” tweeted Rep. Ilhan OmarIlhan OmarOminous warnings from Afghanistan’s last men standing Photos of the Week: Afghanistan evacuees, Paralympics and the French fire Omar: America should open its arms to refugees fleeing Afghanistan MORE (D-Minn.), a crusader against a hawkish approach to military intervention.

“We never should have begun America’s longest war in the first place — a war of endless suffering and needless death,” added Rep. Jamaal Bowman (D-N.Y.). “A top priority right now must be raising the refugee cap and assisting as many Afghans as possible with resettlement. My office stands ready to help.”

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-CortezAlexandria Ocasio-CortezOn The Money — Companies consider making unvaccinated workers pay Progressive Democratic lawmakers urge Biden to replace Powell as Fed chair Business groups aim to divide Democrats on .5T spending bill MORE (D-N.Y.) hosted a town hall on Friday after the fatal bombing at the Kabul airport. Earlier in the week, she and Rep. Barbara LeeBarbara Jean LeeOvernight Defense & National Security — America’s longest war ends Juan Williams: Biden is right on Afghanistan House members to urge FDA to remove in-person requirement for abortion medication MORE (D-Calif) — the only member of Congress to vote against the Bush-era war act — sent a joint letter to Biden asking him to allow more individuals into the country through the Refugee Admissions Program.

While the decision to withdraw early into Biden’s administration was applauded by the left, there is also a sizable contingent speaking out about the way the exit was handled.

Trump and other Republicans strongly condemned the president’s end-game strategy and sought to portray him as incapable of skillfully handling a tough military decision other presidents didn’t want to touch. Multiple GOP senators and the Republican National Committee called for his resignation. Sen. Ben SasseBen SasseBiden: ‘No deadline’ for Americans still in Afghanistan who want to leave Biden faces unfinished mission of evacuating Americans Overnight Defense & National Security — America’s longest war ends MORE (R-Neb.) said Biden was displaying “cowardice and incompetence.”

Click Here: Germany soccer tracksuit

And Biden’s approval rating took a hit. In a Morning Consult survey released on Monday, 49 percent of voters polled said they disapprove of the president’s job performance.

Still, some progressives discount critiques of ill preparation as disingenuous, claiming things were never going to be easy towards the very end. Biden appeared to agree with that assessment in his remarks.

“I take responsibility for the decision,” he reiterated, a line he’s used in previous national addresses. “Now some say we should have started mass evacuations sooner and couldn’t this have been done in a more orderly manner? I respectfully disagree.”

There’s also talk among Democrats and Republicans about the optics of praising the effort that has left somewhere between 100 and 200 Americans still in the country, according to the latest estimate by Secretary of State Antony BlinkenAntony BlinkenKlain: ‘I don’t know if we will ever recognize’ Taliban House lawmakers introduce bill to increase special immigrant visa cap by 10K for Afghan partners Florida restaurant owner tells Biden supporters to ‘take your business elsewhere’ MORE. Biden also tried to assuage those concerns.

“The bottom line: 90 percent of Americans in Afghanistan who wanted to leave were able to leave,” he said during his nearly 30-minute remarks. “And for those remaining Americans, there is no deadline. We remain committed to get them out if they want to come out.”

The focus on evacuating more people from Kabul is likely to escalate as the federal government juggles several top priorities heading into September. The degree to which Democrats will be united around a refugee strategy remains to be seen, some said.

So far, the party has sustained differences in opinion over “policy” versus “process” during the withdrawal stages, with progressives stressing the importance of the former and moderates taking issue with the latter.

“The Democratic Party needs to be valuing both positions equally at the same time,” said Emily Amick, a lawyer and former senior aide to Senate Majority Leader Charles SchumerChuck SchumerThe major emitter that’s missing from climate negotiations Polluters would help foot the bill for conservation under Democratic spending proposal Oil producers push Democrats to preserve key drilling deduction MORE (D-N.Y.) “I don’t think the party can choose one or the other. They have to choose both.”