Click:discrete components
A ruling by the Nebraska Supreme Court on Friday removes an obstacle for approval of the Keystone XL pipeline—a decision, environmental groups say, that means President Obama can and must exercise his authority to fully reject the pipeline.
Nebraska landowners had challenged the constitutionality of a state law, LB 1161 (pdf), which allowed Gov. Dave Heineman to approve TransCanada’s tar sands pipeline route. The victory a lower court dealt the pipeline opponents in February was reversed with Friday’s high court decision (pdf). Though four of the seven justices sided with landowners, a fifth was needed by state law when constitutional issues are raised.
White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest said Tuesday that Obama would veto legislation that forced the approval of Keystone XL, and said that the Nebraska legal battle was “impeding a final conclusion about this pipeline.” He added, “Once that is resolved, that should speed the completion of the evaluation of that project.”
Environmental groups charge that the final conclusion should be clear to Obama: the pipeline must be rejected.
“No matter the route, as long as the pipeline is carrying tar sands oil it is a global warming disaster and fails the President’s climate test,” stated 350.org Executive Director May Boeve.
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT